Over on Facebook, I posted this pic:
Which led to the following (somewhat edited) conversation
Rachel: How sad is it that the only way I'm able to deal with this is to think, "Yeah but life expectencies were way shorter back then so if you figure the Beast is probably at least mid-20s and Belle is probably 18 or so (to avoid an ick factor, not because of the average marriage age) then in 2 decades they're both nearly or in their 40s so they've lived a long full life anyways and besides Belle probably died in childbirth.
And that's making me feel BETTER.
Me: Life expectancy of a 20-year old in 1845 (the earliest I can find data for) was about 60. People dying before the age of 1 _really_ skews the average life expectancy. See second graph here
- Living to 1 meant an average life expectancy of 47, but living to 20 meant you'd probably make it to 60.
Mark: But what Andy's stats don't show is that 90% of fictional aristocrats were smuggled out of France by Sir Percy Blakeney . So they probably lived to a ripe old age in a minor country house in the borders or the north of England.
Ian: This all cries out for a sequel. With a Pimpernel/Beauty/Beast love triangle, a pale and villainous Robespierre played by Jeremy Irons, and a singing, dancing magical guillotine.
Michael: Unless they were smuggled out in the Marie Celeste, which would have been a bummer, frankly.
Rachel: this makes me feel way, way better, actually :-)
Nancy: The Beast and Belle are smart people. Maybe they'd see the Revolution coming and get out of France.
Gwen: I definitely think that makes sense for their characters. I can see Belle being very politically savvy, and Beast being completely in sympathy with the people (but realistic about their likely hatred for him) once Belle had gotten to him.
Dan: Their son probably became one of Napoleon's marshals.Summary: My friends are the best.
Original post on Dreamwidth
- there are