October 28th, 2010


Delicious LiveJournal Links for 10-28-2010

how awesome I am

Pacing back and forth

Damp expert arriving in twenty minutes. Have taken the afternoon off to wait for them. Terribly nervous.

Off this evening to the cinema to see The Social Network. Very intrigued to see what Fincher/Sorkin make of it. If anyone else fancies it then let me know :->
how big?


The specialist* came around, told me that the people who fucked up my flat are a bunch of monkeys**, that they did an incompetent job in the room they "fixed", and completely ignored the other room. He says there's about four days of work needed to fix all of this (lots of joists need to be ripped/replaced).

I phoned the loss adjuster, who was sceptical. I'll be forwarding the report as soon as I get it on Monday. Hopefully it will make the case for me. We will see what comes out of it. But I intend to be a lot more proactive about sorting this out than I was a year ago, and I don't intend to have the previous lot of people back in if I have any say in the matter.

*You could tell he was a specialist because he knew the latin name for the kind of wet-rot growing on the floorboards.

**Well, he told me that his firm get a chunk of business from clearing up this other firm's messes.

The Social Network

There was absolutely no way I couldn't go and see a movie directed by David Fincher and written by Aaron Sorkin. And when I saw that it was sitting at 97% on Rotten Tomatoes and 8.5 on the IMDB I knew I wasn't going to be disappiinted. And I wasn't. It looks and sounds great, and the writing crackles with energy.

The film is nominally about Facebook. I say it's about Facebook because it is - it's based on a nonfiction book, and seems to cover the history very well so far as I remember. And I say "nominally" because, well, it could be about any number of people that started small, achieved success, and got catapulted into situations where they could fuck over people who they'd been calling best friends the week before. Heck, that's pretty much a trope - it's almost the plot of Boogie Nights, to pluck an example out of the air.

What it does best is illuminate characters without ever explaining them. Nobody here really seems to understand themselves, or those around them - the things it feels closest to, in fact, is Mad Men. And in line with that we never really get to see inside the character's heads. The closest we ever get to explanations of motivation are the two speeches, both given by women, that bookend the movie. These feel like the voice of the writer, fed up with the unpleasant atmosphere of misanthropy, sexism, and sociopathic capitalism that run through the rest of the movie, pointing out that the world that the characters inhabit is, in its own way, a niche. I don't have to live in the same world as these characters, even if I do get to use the software they write.

For that I should be grateful.


(Thanks to hfnuala for pointing out that the movie was bookended by decent female characters, unlike the body of the movie, where the characters do their very best to surround themselves with pretty things that they don't have to think about, much less engage with.)
smoking horse

Simulated Life Is Confusing

Looking over Julie's shoulder:
J: *Has the latest expansion pack. It is all about famous people. Who apparently have butlers. Oh, and undead people.*
A: *sees two of the sims in their underwear. One bites the other on the arm.*
A: Why did he just bite her?
J: Because he's a vampire.
A: She has a butler who's a vampire? Cool!
J: No. He's the famous person. She's the butler.
A: Oh. That makes _much_ more sense.