|
Month |
2011 |
2012 |
Drop |
|
Jan |
731 |
684 |
6% |
|
February |
715 |
612 |
14% |
|
March |
815 |
558 |
32% |
|
April |
788 |
541 |
31% |
|
May |
862 |
537 |
38% |
|
June |
759 |
665 |
12% |
|
July |
810 |
743 |
8% |
|
August |
830 |
610 |
27% |
|
September |
883 |
527 |
40% |
|
October |
725 |
584 |
19% |
|
November |
661 |
309 |
53% |
|
December |
637 |
305 |
52% |
Meanwhile, a quick look at my Google Analytics tells me that compared to last December, this December is 13% down in visits (5,100 versus 5,700) and 33% down in pageviews (10,100 vs 13,400).
You'll note that I'm not offering any solutions here. I do remember a time when more people were posting about what they were reading, playing, watching, and generally doing, but I assume that the pall wore off for most people, or they moved to somewhere where people had real names, and they could talk to their family about it without being embarassed at having a username of "EvilCow666"*. Either that, or you're all sharing pictures of cats over on Tumblr.
*Which is in use at various points on the internet, but not on LJ, so I feel relatively safe using it as an example.
Original post on Dreamwidth - there are
2012-12-31 01:00 pm (UTC)
2012-12-31 01:30 pm (UTC)
Edited at 2012-12-31 01:31 pm (UTC)
2012-12-31 02:03 pm (UTC)
2012-12-31 01:02 pm (UTC)
When people click on you through your facebook link it doesn't count in the stats. So, could it simply be that more people are coming to your page through facebook?
2012-12-31 01:03 pm (UTC)
Certainly the Google stats count every time a page is viewed - why wouldn't the normal LJ ones?
2012-12-31 01:05 pm (UTC)
2012-12-31 01:09 pm (UTC)
What page does it give you?
2012-12-31 01:19 pm (UTC)
2012-12-31 01:20 pm (UTC)
2012-12-31 01:22 pm (UTC)
2012-12-31 01:07 pm (UTC)
2012-12-31 01:20 pm (UTC)
2012-12-31 01:23 pm (UTC)
2012-12-31 01:40 pm (UTC)
2012-12-31 02:29 pm (UTC)
Now, those things happen via FB, or other means. Both because those have better tools for doing so, but also because I think many people's real-life-friends-who-are-active-on-LJ pool has significantly dropped.
I look back over my LJ from now 'till when it started, and I note that pre-2009, I announced my birthday plans on here, and had a lot of useful discussion and arrangement about such on there. After that, the amount of response I got here was much lower, and this year I didn't even bother to announce it here.
Part of that is new friends groups, but a lot of it is just people stopping keeping up with LJ.
2012-12-31 02:07 pm (UTC)
2012-12-31 05:36 pm (UTC)
And most of my posts are photo-posts...
If users read your posts from their Friends page, does that show up in the stats? That is, if they don't actually click through to your blog?
Just a thought.
I think FB has siphoned away a lot of users. Which is a shame, since when I started blogging, LJ was the most "social" blogging platform. Perhaps since FB has become the place to share stuff with, for instance, family, it has become the first stopping point - and a lot of people stop there! I check FB several times a day, but LJ once a day at most - and then most of the posts are links...
2012-12-31 07:52 pm (UTC)
2012-12-31 09:58 pm (UTC)
2012-12-31 09:45 pm (UTC)
2013-01-01 04:33 pm (UTC)
2013-01-02 05:33 pm (UTC)
2013-01-02 06:35 pm (UTC)
2013-01-02 07:03 pm (UTC)
2013-01-02 07:06 pm (UTC)
And I know some people on Tumblr.
But 700-odd comments in a month isn't bad, I could certainly live with that level of engagement in the long term.
2013-01-01 05:27 pm (UTC)
All the available hours are taken. At this point, competition for audience is zero-sum. The burger chains ( a thoroughly saturated market!) can expand to coffees and breakfasts, but "social media" have no more hours to expand their competition into.
2013-01-02 11:20 pm (UTC)
I know one chap who writes a html page, hosts it on his own server, tweets the url and has the tweets auto fed to lj, fb and google+! All kinda semi-automatic.
2013-01-03 08:41 am (UTC)