And this is, of course, also a response to the OSBP, which struck me as one of those misguided things which was probably fine with the few people who were first involved in it, but OMG so not fine as a general meme.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Also - when she did get back to my room we ate chips and discussed databases. Which was exactly the kind of geeky fun I'd had in mind when I invited her back.

When we met up with her partner later on she actually told them that she trusted me and I'd behaved well. As if not being a complete bastard was worthy of note.

I weep, I really do.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

That article does a nice job of cherrypicking the statistics to make their case.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

The BCS figures are the interesting bit - and generally considered to be reliable.

The "Have known women who..." bits clearly not as much use.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

I'm curious, because I've been following the conversation but haven't commented yet - you seem to have a real hard-on, if you'll excuse the expression, for doubting the rape and sexual assault stats. I understand, sort of, if this is just a generalized hate for statistics which are often mis-used but it more reeks of not wanting to face the fact that the vast majority of women have been the victim of sexualized violence.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Specifically? I know the statistics fairly well, but haven't gone through them with the toothcomb that Unity has—he very much doesn't like misleading use of statistics, it's a pet hate of his, so if you think it's wrong or he's misused it feel free to tell him.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

I think you are an exceptional person, Andy.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

The whole thing seemed a bit bizarre to me.

What percentage of women have been sexually assaulted? is an interesting question. Of those women what percentage have experienced the different types / levels of sexual assault?

A question along the lines of 'What percentage of people know a woman (or perhaps person) who has been sexually assaulted in some way?". Leads to very high numbers without that necessarily meaning something really bad is happening to a lot of people.

For example: I have had a very drunken girl kiss me unexpectedly. I did not want to be kissed by this girl, so it was a type of sexual assault. It was more of an annoyance than something I'd be terribly upset about though. But if you then asked my (let's say) 20 friends if they knew anyone who had been sexually assaulted they'd all have to say yes. If I then said "[very high > 90]% of people surveyed know someone who has been sexually assaulted" you get a very different idea from what (in my case) actually happened (in terms of how bad the assault was, and how rare it was).

The rarity thing is because to get useful information about how many people are sexually assaulted you have to somehow unpack / decompress the answer by plugging in the level of connectedness of people, which intuitively we don't do (and don't have any figures for).

So, I think the whole exercise is probably quite bankrupt and misleading.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

What's bankrupt? I'm completely confused by your response - I explicitly said that I _wasn't_ pulling figures from "who do you know that..." type questions, and linked to a page that included the following:
For the previous year (2004/5), the British Crime Survey recorded that 0.2% of female respondents reported having been raped at some point during the year, and if that figure is statistically valid - and the BCS survey is generally considered to be the more reliable measure of actual crime, then with a female population of 15.6 million, the estimated number of rapes using survey data would be around 31,000, a figure that doubles to 62-63,000 when you include attempted rape.

Overall, 2.8% of women reported to that BCS survey that, in the year it covered, they had been subjected to sexual violence of some description (included attempted assaults), which gives an extrapolated ‘raw’ figure of just over 435,000 women.
which strikes me as being about as hard as the data gets for these things.

I'm not sure exactly how you got the idea anyone was trying to go direct from my poll to hard numbers on victims.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread) (Expand)

> You wouldn't make the kind of statement in a rape survivor's group, after all. But the stats seem to show that if you're around more than 4 women then you _are_ in the middle of a rape survivor's group...

Yes, that's a very important point that seems to be forgotten a lot of the time.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

I think society desperatly needs good information to be able to judge serious societal issues such as Rape. What REALLY pisses me off though, is the way that some of the rape studies are done because they invalidate the study. An example of this is "have you been presurised into sex". Yes, I know that this does cover seriouse issues such as someone f***ing with your mind, or threats, but it can also cover, "well my boyfriend really wanted to, but I didnt really feel in the mood, but I really wanted to make him happy, and I have no regrets". Ok, Rant over.

I would also say I probably know a lot more woman that have been raped then I think I do. I suspect a lot of them keep it quiet.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Absolutely. The language is incredibly important.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

What REALLY pisses me off though, is the way that some of the rape studies are done because they invalidate the study.

Aye, the Amnesty study of a few years back had several leading questions that inflated numbers and "showed" attitudes were bad, in fact the way they worded it made attitudes look a lot worse than they are.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

I think a gray area also exists around consenting age.

According to the law, anyone under 16 is not able to consent to sex, therefore making it a sort of rape. But I don't think many people who have lost their cherry under the age of 16 will prosecute the person they had sex with.

This gives also gives an added interpretation issue.

What I would also like to bring up is that a heck of a lot of guilt is involved with victims of rape/sexual assault/being taken advantage of. The victims also often feel it is their fault and I think more so with victims that didn't/couldn't fight back. This guilt and trauma can last such a long time and I think this is the reason many victims do not report. They believe so strongly it is their fault.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Absolutely.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

A few thoughts occur:

1) I sometimes get the feeling that the PC thing to do is to assume that any one I'm interested in is a potential rape victim, and therefore any advances should be made with a ten foot pole, wrapped in koosh balls. Basically, as non-threatening and non-sexual as possible.

Now, I think it's a great idea to not kick people when they're down, or in their sensitive bits. But I also don't think that it's healthy to assume that everyone is like that and therefore can't deal with it/needs respect in the form of treating them like a leper.

And this follows through into my second point.

2) I really don't like that sexual abuse victims are perceived as broken, shy, destroyed, and pretty much any form of helpless and damaged that you can imagine. It is something that can be gotten over, it is possible to live a normal life afterwards.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Absolutely - and true of all people who have suffered trauma.

But if someone I knew had been in a car crash I'd be at least _careful_ with comments about pile-ups and fast driving.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread) (Expand)

In regards to rape/sexual assault - and I'm talking actual assault or actual attempted assault, not a drunken snog (which unfortunately some men think is an example of sexual assault - ffs???), I'm talking about what comes after that - in most cases it *is* someone the woman knows. That's what makes it more difficult to trust blokes, because the woman has not solely been physically and sexually violated, but her trust and friendship towards that man has been violated.

But what also feeds into this whole issue is this excellent point you made:

how it must be ok to just _say_ things to women - after all, it's just speech, how could it be dangerous?

Well said. I know a lot of women who distrust men specifically because of comments that they've made. Specifically, comments along the lines of how women are like cars that can be taken out for a test drive, or comments that reflect an attitude that no matter what the bloke's personality and physical appearance he can (and *should* be able to) sleep with any woman he wants. Some might dismiss this as 'lol just male pride' but to carry this attitude around with you, that any woman you show attention to should be grateful for it and therefore reciprocate your feelings, is sickening and is a pretty good reason why a lot of women won't trust men and don't want to be alone with them...because attention and compliments of any type have a sexualised meaning behind them.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

I'd have to say, out of all my boyfriends/girlfriends/dalliances, you have been the only *male* that never touched upon the subject in an inappropriate way. But then we both came to realise that one of the reasons I choose you was that, despite whatever annoying stuff you have (and everyone has annoying stuff, that's not a dig at you), you're incredibly, incredibly safe. I love that about you.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

A friend told me recently that she pulls faces when walking home at night to avoid being hit on.

I can't imagine how anyone could think that hitting on someone walking home alone would be a good idea. It's madness.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

I feel pretty uncomfortable about this entire meta discussion. Will discuss with you in private sometime.

But I do think one of the big problems with believing, or "perceptions of", the stats, is that when you say "rape", everyone - including women - thinks of a stranger in an alley. Whereas, just as with child abuse, most forced sex, non consensual sex or sexual assualt happens with people you know, often partners or husbands. (marital rape was in fact legally impossible till really quite reasonably.) "Date rape" captures some of this but again trivialises the issue as it's just as common in long term relationships as in one night stands (says seh: I have no stats for this but it's my impression from talking to lawyers, policemen etc.) It's just harder to convince a court of this - or to get someone to take on a prosecution.

Below you can see a few guys - at least one of whom I know to be apparently perfectly reasonable - discussing how women having sex because their partner is keen and they're not in the mood but it'd easier just to give in than to argue, is AOK. is it really guys? Anyhow, however you feel, it will affect the nos in these stats.

Another point no one's really touched on is that when you ask people if they "know" someone who has suffered rape or assault, they will filter it through these perceptions as to whether they decide they believe the reported account. And there are general credibility problems - short skirts etc - which is one of very many reasons why rape reports are so low.

I think much here is rather binary and un-nuanced. Not all men are rapists and not all women are victims and not all men and women perceive things like that, and the truth is way more grey.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

...happens with people you know, often partners or husbands
A point I made in my post.

I think much here is rather binary and un-nuanced.
There certainly is in the comments. I don't believe there is in the post.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

I had a big rant planned for this, but I'm really struggling to formulate the right response. Everytime I start, there are tangents I am going down that lead onto huge paragraphs of exceptions. So I shall be concise:-

I don't believe that there are a huge proportion of women being raped, nor a large proportion of men capable of doing so. Women get the rough end of the deal in this society at the moment which regards to sexual innuendo and harrassment, but shouldn't tar every male with the brush that others deserve.

Gah. So much to say on the subject but without people to bounce ideas off in person it is difficult to respond to this subject without risking upsetting or offending someone when just trying to put your point across.

Damn you Andy. Can your next poll be on Sushi please?

(Reply to this) (Thread) (Expand)

It's not a _huge_ proportion. It's only about 9% over their lifetime.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

PS - am very open about the below, not making any big emotional revelations in this comment, and anyone who knows me vaguely well will probably have heard me mention it at least in passing before.

When I was fourteen, the older brother of a boy who was bullying me at school forced me to perform oral sex on him. About six months later, a boy who I was seeing at the time attempted to rape me. I beat him off with a bit of tubular steel, but that's a whole other story!

About eighteen months ago, I was in a taxi at about 3am with a female friend when the driver pulled over into a deserted side-road, got out of the car and started trying to climb into the back seat and grope us. We yelled expletives, ran off into somewhere more populated, and got a different taxi home.

A few months ago ago, I was having a ciggie outside a bar in Streatham when a guy wandering past said something extremely rude and slapped my arse, quite hard. Just last week, a bloke at a bus stop suddenly grabbed one of my breasts. I made a fuss, another woman nearby joined in, and he wandered off.

Every time I leave the house I get at least one comment from a strange man, ranging from the quite-sweet-really ("you're beautiful") to the disgusting and obscene (I'm not even prepared to type here some of the things I've had called to me in the street).

None of this is unusual. Women live with this every fucking day. That woman reacted to you like that because you are not the norm.

(Reply to this) (Thread) (Expand)

I wonder if the other men _are_ the norm - or if they're just very obvious. You must see dozens/hundreds of men on any one trip, and if only one is obnoxious then that's the whole trip coloured.

I don't have any figures on obnoxious men levels...

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread) (Expand)

From my personal experience there are women things happen to and women things don't happen to. I think it will be a curved graph of never to always etc. I don't know why some women attract more nut jobs in the street but I've seen it happen. I can't imagine how this phenomenon works. I very rarely get shouted at in the street, but when out with certain friends it happens disturbingly frequently. No one has ever tried to kiss me in a lift.
I'm not sure what I'm trying to say, other than, not all women think all men are like that? I am hesitating over making any claim to fractions of the population, partly because my friends group is not representative of the population at large and I think different groups will have different experiences.
On a bad head spack day I think it means I'm a lesser person, that no one wants to try it on with me. Most of the time I think its a very positive thing!

(Reply to this) (Thread) (Expand)

I agree with all of this, especially the last paragraph. I've never experienced any of the things seph_hazard says are usual, and never been kissed in a lift (apart from consensually by my partner).

I don't recall any of my female friends ever telling me about these things happening to them, either. (But maybe if they're in the subset who do experience these things regularly, then they probably think all women do, and they probably don't think any such incident is remarkable enough to tell me about?)

(Hi, btw; I'm a lurker from atreic's friends page.)

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread) (Expand)

And this time, we arrived at the hotel with bags of chips in our hands and needed somewhere to eat them where the staff wouldn't get upset.

Australia is officially eating my brain! In Australia chips = crisps and hot chips = chips.

When I first read this I thought it was odd that a hotel would have a problem with people eating crisps on the premises. And it took me around six or seven hours for it to click that you meant were eating a bag of hot chips. Argh!

(Reply to this) (Thread)

And to think you were there!

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread) (Expand)